HomeTable of ContentsFeedbackSubscribeHelp/AboutArchivesSearch
 
Science News Online
[search]
[go]
  





















Science News for Kids
Science News
for Kids

Audible Science News Subscribe to an
audio format

Published by
Science Service

Print this article
Email this article to a friend

Week of Nov. 18, 2006; Vol. 170, No. 21 , p. 324

Unstoppable Bot: Armed with self-scrutiny, a mangled robot moves on

Peter Weiss

Severe maulings hardly slowed down the robotic assassins in the Terminator science fiction movies. Now, roboticists have made a real machine that carries on despite serious damage.

a7898_1309.jpg

I FEEL PRETTY. In this fanciful image, a newly developed robot stands over water in which the machine is mirrored as a colorful block figure. By conjuring and using such a simple model of itself, the device can adapt to damage more readily than ordinary robots do.
Bongard, et al./Science

The crucial factor in that feat, the robot's developers say, was to program the device's computer to create and update a representation of the machine's physical structure. That way, when the robot broke, the device recognized its changed condition and found new ways to reach its goals.

In the Nov. 17 Science, computer scientist Josh Bongard of the University of Vermont in Burlington and his colleagues describe a starfishlike, ambulatory machine that they created. They report detaching a portion of one of the four legs and that, in response to the insult, the device changed its gait.

Under similar circumstances, most conventional robots would stop functioning, notes Christoph Adami of the Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences in Claremont, Calif., commenting in the same issue of Science.

The self-adjusting machine could adapt because its computer software includes a novel algorithm, explains mechanical engineer and team leader Hod Lipson of Cornell University. In that algorithm, the machine uses electrical readings from its two tilt sensors and eight motors to determine its structure.

In an iterative process, the computer figures out which of about 100,000 possible arrangements of the machine's parts is generating those readings, Bongard says.

Once the computer comes up with a plausible structure, it hypothesizes many series of component movements and calculates how far the robot could move as a result of each series, Lipson adds. Finally, the robot implements the motions that it predicts will maximize the distance traveled—the goal specified for it by its designers.

The new work is "a major advance in autonomous robotics," says roboticist Dario Floreano of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne. "The algorithm ... is very efficient and applicable to a wide range of robots."

Typically, when creating a robot, developers face two daunting tasks, says Cornell mechanical engineer Victor Zykov, a codesigner of the new machine. The scientists must devise a detailed, mathematical model of the device and also create a related control mechanism that operates the robot under various conditions.

In the new experiment, neither step was necessary. "This achievement could be expanded to other machines that are difficult to control," Zykov adds. Those could include the remarkably agile prosthetic limbs currently under development, Lipson says.

"Designing robots that can adapt to changing environments and can compensate for damage has been a difficult problem," comments neuroscientist Olaf Sporns of Indiana University in Bloomington. "This work provides a new way toward solving this important problem."

Sporns uses robots to study how body structure influences the data that a machine or organism gathers about its environment. With the new self-modeling robot, cognitive scientists might investigate whether people and other animals employ abstract representations of their bodies and environments, Lipson says.


If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.


To subscribe to Science News (print), go to
https://www.kable.com/pub/scnw/ subServices.asp.

To sign up for the free weekly e-LETTER from Science News, go to
http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/subscribe_form.asp.

References:

Adami, C. 2006. What do robots dream of? Science 314(Nov. 17):1093-1094. Summary available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/314/5802/1093.

Lungarella, M., and O. Sporns. 2006. Mapping information flow in sensorimotor networks. PLoS Computational Biology 2(October):e144. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020144.

Bongard, J., V. Zykov, and H. Lipson. 2006. Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science 314(Nov. 17):1118-1121. Abstract available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/314/5802/1118.

Further Readings:

Moreira, N. 2005. Easy striders. Science News 168(Aug. 6):88-90. Available at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050806/bob8.asp.

Weiss, P. 2005. In its own image: Simple robot replicates itself block by block. Science News 167(May 14):310. Available to subscribers at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050514/fob7.asp.

A version of this article written for younger readers is available at Science News for Kids.

Sources:

Christoph Adami
Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences
Claremont, CA 91711

Josh Bongard
Department of Computer Science
University of Vermont
Burlington, VT 05405

Dario Floreano
Institute of Systems Engineering
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)
Building ELE, Station 11
CH-1015 Lausanne
Switzerland

Hod Lipson
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853

Olaf Sporns
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Indiana University
Bloomington, IN 47405

Victor Zykov
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853



From Science NewsVol. 170, No. 21, Nov. 18, 2006, p. 324.

Science News
Web