Unstoppable Bot: Armed with self-scrutiny, a mangled robot moves on
Peter Weiss
Severe maulings hardly slowed down the robotic assassins in the Terminator science fiction movies. Now, roboticists have made a real machine that carries on despite serious damage.
 | I
FEEL PRETTY. In this fanciful image, a newly developed robot stands
over water in which the machine is mirrored as a colorful block figure.
By conjuring and using such a simple model of itself, the device can
adapt to damage more readily than ordinary robots do. Bongard, et al./Science |
The crucial factor in that feat, the robot's developers say, was to
program the device's computer to create and update a representation of
the machine's physical structure. That way, when the robot broke, the
device recognized its changed condition and found new ways to reach its
goals.
In the Nov. 17 Science, computer scientist Josh Bongard
of the University of Vermont in Burlington and his colleagues describe
a starfishlike, ambulatory machine that they created. They report
detaching a portion of one of the four legs and that, in response to
the insult, the device changed its gait.
Under similar circumstances, most conventional robots would
stop functioning, notes Christoph Adami of the Keck Graduate Institute
of Applied Life Sciences in Claremont, Calif., commenting in the same
issue of Science.
The self-adjusting machine could adapt because its computer
software includes a novel algorithm, explains mechanical engineer and
team leader Hod Lipson of Cornell University. In that algorithm, the
machine uses electrical readings from its two tilt sensors and eight
motors to determine its structure. In an iterative process, the computer figures out which of
about 100,000 possible arrangements of the machine's parts is
generating those readings, Bongard says.
Once the computer comes up with a plausible structure, it
hypothesizes many series of component movements and calculates how far
the robot could move as a result of each series, Lipson adds. Finally,
the robot implements the motions that it predicts will maximize the
distance traveled—the goal specified for it by its designers.
The new work is "a major advance in autonomous robotics," says
roboticist Dario Floreano of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
in Lausanne. "The algorithm ... is very efficient and applicable to a
wide range of robots."
Typically, when creating a robot, developers face two daunting
tasks, says Cornell mechanical engineer Victor Zykov, a codesigner of
the new machine. The scientists must devise a detailed, mathematical
model of the device and also create a related control mechanism that
operates the robot under various conditions.
In the new experiment, neither step was necessary. "This
achievement could be expanded to other machines that are difficult to
control," Zykov adds. Those could include the remarkably agile
prosthetic limbs currently under development, Lipson says.
"Designing robots that can adapt to changing environments and
can compensate for damage has been a difficult problem," comments
neuroscientist Olaf Sporns of Indiana University in Bloomington. "This
work provides a new way toward solving this important problem." Sporns uses robots to study how body structure influences the
data that a machine or organism gathers about its environment. With the
new self-modeling robot, cognitive scientists might investigate whether
people and other animals employ abstract representations of their
bodies and environments, Lipson says.
| If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.
|
To subscribe to Science News (print), go to https://www.kable.com/pub/scnw/ subServices.asp.
To sign up for the free weekly e-LETTER from Science News, go to http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/subscribe_form.asp.

References: Adami, C. 2006. What do robots dream of? Science 314(Nov. 17):1093-1094. Summary available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/314/5802/1093.
Lungarella, M., and O. Sporns. 2006. Mapping information flow in sensorimotor networks. PLoS Computational Biology 2(October):e144. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020144.
Bongard, J., V. Zykov, and H. Lipson. 2006. Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science 314(Nov. 17):1118-1121. Abstract available at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/314/5802/1118.
Further Readings: Moreira, N. 2005. Easy striders. Science News 168(Aug. 6):88-90. Available at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050806/bob8.asp.
Weiss, P. 2005. In its own image: Simple robot replicates itself block by block. Science News 167(May 14):310. Available to subscribers at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20050514/fob7.asp.
A version of this article written for younger readers is available at Science News for Kids.
Sources: Christoph Adami Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences Claremont, CA 91711
Josh Bongard Department of Computer Science University of Vermont Burlington, VT 05405
Dario Floreano Institute of Systems Engineering Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) Building ELE, Station 11 CH-1015 Lausanne Switzerland
Hod Lipson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
Olaf Sporns Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405
Victor Zykov Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
|